Analyzing the 20s: A Generation Z Perspective

These are the notes behind a few excerpts from the article Analyzing the 20s: A Generation Z Perspective. 

The  2016 election of Donald Trump, rising economic disparities, and the social isolation of a global pandemic.  These moments have reshaped the way society views class, race, and connection.   

Allow me to devalue a few of the known and unknown thought processes behind the bitter winnings in this crass but influential segment concerning the 20s.  Heartbreak social ⚛️A societal reconstruction of the 2020s that provides opportunity for leveling in blueprints for guides. 

Previous notions

Knowledge of this cycle begins with an individual who can recognize the foreshadowing of Trump's first election.   If one could recall their first encounter with this presidential candidate, then they might say "What is your opinion on an actor becoming president?" After a first term would be a definitive answer as planned efforts and failed plan executions wreaked major havoc in aftereffects for the people of the states.  I will update and look into the previously held debate and post them into the Journ@l Club for further conversation; however, the point I am attempting to access would suggest that our quarrels lead to nothing new in individual lives.  Instead, it seems to lay out a form of representation of an asymmetrical framework and allegiance to eyes that only can consider winning or success instead of the consideration of a people who were never included in the first place.

"Who heals the healer?"  A question brought in the 2020s from research in conflict and conflict resolution.  This could be the 1st foundational thought process when finding one's life purpose. 

Many would not think of themselves as healers, the definitions of the professions that are given to the people who reside in our spaces sometimes do not fully describe the opposite of those actions enough.  For instance, a doctor is a healer, but an inexperienced and an experienced doctor will only be seen or charged with malpractice, and it doesn't fully explain the simultaneous truth.  That a healer may also be a destroyer. 

"Who may heal the broken?"  Following up with the last question, this question should lead readers to understanding the cycle that precedes adults in careers that they choose to pursue.  Entertainment, Construction, Education or Information, Real Estate or Investments, and Healthcare and Hospitality.  A doctor is not a healer in the sense that they resolve the issue; however, a doctor is there to find the issue.  If a doctor and an herbalist were to coincide in health case studies, then there would make a blueprint for hospitals or practices where an environment of trust and respect for a people to treat the cause and not only the symptoms as advertised.

Hospitals and doctors are not the only industry that finds itself facing scrutiny, nor is it the only one indulged in Heartbreak Social.  The entertainment industry failing at its contributions as far as movies and music is concerned seemed to never attempt to solve its issues in the first place.  Why is it that only of the 20's there is finally breakthroughs to extra sectors such as audiomancy and "psychological conditioning music" or diegetic music.  Furthermore, this industry does not use its power for empowerment nor educational purposes which could expand the mind in agreeing "ways" and the failure of the "natural" placements of people who do explore these options not being in the forefront shows this failure to reconnect influence that supports the very workforce that supports it. 

The Integration Point

Emotional detachment and skepticism have become the norm in both personal and professional interactions ...

Issues like student debt, martial law, abortion rights, and the lack of transparency in governance remain at the forefront of societal discourse.

[This integration point will now be used in a different context due to its political engagement and affiliation in accordance with a Gen Z perspective.]

If they'll tear down original structures, then what is to keep one believing in cultural dynamism.  Where is the problem?   The problem lies within the stationary or stagnant development of questions for a whole conglomerate of people(s).  Literally tearing down a structure (Roe v Wade) just to ask "would you have taken it down", does this seem as though it's a play you would like to see?  | AKA when making a point goes too far. |

Continuing on, martial law is another piece of the equation that looms overhead, as most of our support goes into militant resources, except for veterans. The stress from this inequivalent exchange led to inferential questions that were not posed until today.  The pursuit of higher education in tandem with the lack of "enduring" qualifications may unravel the string that holds an original cycle together.

The profit off of the people who choose to pursue education and their counterparts who do not is reason enough for the Higher Educational system to not be so expensive.  Concerning student debt, it should not cost higher than the highest utility bill.  Also while speaking on the Energy & Utilities Industry, if the utility statements were to stay at a consistent value, then that in itself would level the mental strain on the people of the states.  If this were to not happen then there are riders that have not been able to be implemented with this proposal.   

For further notes and conversations please consider Journ@l Club.  For further insight to this subject please refer to chapter 10 Book of Higher Thoughts.